FERNANDO QUIJANO ECON201 FALL96

His material is very unclear, he is unclear. This is like a senior class for students of Harvard. It's hard!

I like how you review for your test. I think without that this would be an extremely difficult class.

The instructor said at the beginning of class that his tests were made up by him and consisted mainly of his notes. However after the 3^rd exam the instructor told the class that tests had come from a packet included w/ the text. He is twice as hard to understand because of his accent.

He is fun to learn from. He makes things fun and interesting. He keeps me coherent.

This was a very good course. He did a good job of covering the material and preparing us for the tests.

Mr. Quijano is a very well educated in the subject of economics. He did a great job in preparing us for tests. I was impressed with how much he knew about what he was teaching.

Professor Quijano made the course challenging and interesting, I would recommend him to friends when choosing classes.

His notes were easy to understand and well defined. The test review helped me a lot to better understand the material and to prepare for the test.

Mr. Quijano seems to have a thorough knowledge of this subject, and is always willing to help a student if they ask. I wish there were more assignments to get points off of besides the tests. ( this would help a lot of students.)

He does a good job teaching, but I feel some of his course policies are out of line.

He should, also, maybe have some sort of outside work so that there is more to a grade than strictly tests.

There was not enough time for the test, too many questions. Instructor knew material did not make lectures fit the tests. He treated students as peons and as the ruler.

Very hard to fit his office hours with my schedule and not allowed to call him at other times or have messages for him.

The course material is interesting and the Quijano knowledge and enthusiasm makes the course fun.

I think he's a good teacher. Doesn't rush material. Beings laughter with him.

By no fault of the instructor the course material seems to be far too extensive for an introduction course. For those students who need simply a general economics background for their major, the present ext goes far beyond this objective. Instead of concentrating on the economics the algebric formulas rather then the definitions.

I think professor Quijano was a very good teacher. He taught with respect and he respected the students. He had a very good knowledge of the subject. I would take another class from Fernando.

I think this was a very worthwhile course to take. I think Fernando does a very good job in explaining material in a way your average students can understand. I personally got a lot out of this course.

I think that the instructor was very interesting and that he had a lot of knowledge of Economics. He kept the students interested in the subject which makes the class go by faster and more students like that. He thoroughly showed the information to the students. If you had a problem, he was there to help you in class. I would take more classes with him because he is a great instructor.

I believe that Mr. Quijano knows that he is talking about, but I don't think that he takes appropriate consideration to his students. He seems to have a attitude problem and if you don't have a copy of his when and when not to bug him, you really ought to get one. He needs to reevaluate his reasons for teaching. If I had an alternate teacher for this course I would take it from someone else!

Very enthusiastic. Encouraged us (strongly) to use text for additional resource material.

Mr. Quijano has don an outstanding job in making Microeconomics interesting and understandable.

The first day of class, all students received a syllabus and his criteria regarding attendance, absences, class participation, course prerequisites, page-number, phone number, and testing. He also advised students to work with a classmate to help one another with microeconomics.

Microeconomics is a class that requires attendance and note taking. The students who attend class, read their materials have very little excuse for not receiving acceptable grades. The students who do not comprehend Mr. Quijano's lecture and the resulting tests, have poor attendance and did not read the material assigned. The numerous times Mr. Quijano asked the students if they read the material assigned, few students raised their hands. Students are responsible for their grades. They will receive the grade which correspondences to their effort and time spent on Microeconomics.

Mr. Quijano's tests were fair and covered the materials in the textbook and notes covered in class. On review days, we ere allowed to bring in tape recorders.

I want to stress that I took Macroeconomics from a now retired instructor. I had to drop his course due to pneumonia. Mr. Quijano's method of teaching is more interesting and up-to-date. Economics is very important in the ever-changing technological age, and Mr. Quijano presents updated materials.

My final point: I plan to take more courses from Mr. Quijano and recommend his teaching methods. In my opinion, Mr. Quijano is an asset to DSU.